| Skepticism
Aside, Catholic Scholars Go in Search of 'Lobbying Ethics,' by William Bole
(February, 2003)
Michael H. McCarthy recalls that over the past few
years, when he told friends and colleagues that he was taking part in a
project on lobbying ethics, they usually laughed or looked at him quizzically.
To many of them, the very notion of lobbying
ethics seemed "either an oxymoron or the description of a quixotic
task," said McCarthy, a philosophy professor at Vassar College who was
part of a research team at the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown
University in Washington.
The Woodstock team certainly didn't write off
this fast-changing institution as beyond ethical reach. The Jesuit-sponsored
center has issued a book titled "The Ethics of Lobbying: Organized
Interests, Political Power, and the Common Good," newly published by
Georgetown University Press after four years of study involving scores of
prominent lobbyists together with ethicists and policy makers.
Included in the 110-page book are the
"Woodstock Principles for the Ethical Conduct of Lobbying," a
first-of-its-kind set of guidelines for all those involved in the process.
The skepticism that McCarthy encountered was real
enough, though the popular images of corrupt lobbyists are mostly outdated.
Few lobbyists today use bribery and other illegal tactics of the trade, but
they do have highly sophisticated ways of manipulating public policy on behalf
of private interests, often out of public view.
For example, the pharmaceutical industry
reportedly has 636 paid lobbyists in Washington: more than one for every
member of Congress. It spends $180 million a year on lobbying.
One item in the Woodstock Principles is directed
at a particular kind of lobbying campaign that the industry has perfected.
Under the heading of candid disclosure, the document states that lobbyists
should have no part in "front organizations" that conceal the true
identity of their clients.
Many critics complain that the pharmaceutical
industry finances so-called grassroots organizations with names like
"United Seniors Association." These groups oppose initiatives to
extend Medicare coverage to prescription drugs and otherwise control drug
costs. People who see their television commercials usually have no idea the
industry is behind the multi-million-dollar ad campaigns.
The Woodstock Principles also tackle bigger
questions. One has to do with a concept that Catholic theologians have talked
about for centuries - the "common good." The first principle
states: "The pursuit of lobbying must take into account the common good,
not merely a particular client's interests narrowly considered."
That may seem reasonable enough to those steeped
in the Catholic tradition, but the proposition has already set off fireworks
in Washington.
| In
the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, the common good is
"the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social
groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready
access to their own fulfillment."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church
cites three fundamental requirements:
- respect for the person,
- social well-being and development,
including access to the things people need in order to live a
truly human life,
- and peace, which is the
"stability and security of a just order."
In Catholic teaching, these and other
"goods" are the social requirements of human dignity. They
are what people need in order to live as free and responsible beings,
children of God, members of one human family, brothers and sisters in
Christ. |
"Unfortunately, I am afraid that I have
trouble with the concept that there is an immutable common good that provides
a measurable guidepost for lobbying activity," said Thomas Susman, a
prominent lawyer-lobbyist.
Susman subscribes to most of the Woodstock
Principles but draws the line at the common good -- which, in Catholic
teaching, includes special attention to the needs of the poor and vulnerable.
"The Ten Commandments - our most important
and revered ethical code - say nothing about the disadvantaged and
vulnerable. I question whether a lobbyists' code should."
These remarks, during a recent forum at
Georgetown, did not surprise McCarthy. He and other facilitators spent many
hours in conversation with high-powered Washington lobbyists. Whenever the
question came up, the response typically was, "Who knows what the common
good is?"
McCarthy had a direct response to that skepticism.
"The common good is what we are properly
seeking to discover through public deliberation and argument. In its general
outlines, it's already known in advance, but in its needed concreteness,
especially as it bears on policy making and law, it is still to be discovered
through practical inquiry and informed debate."
McCarthy and others argue that a commitment to the
common good is no luxury in a sound democracy. Without it, politics is ruled
by special interest - rather than a special concern for the weak and
vulnerable.
Some lobbyists may be agnostic on this question,
but that is not fazing the Woodstock Jesuits. Father Edward B. Arroyo, S.J.,
who coordinated the lobbying project, said he wants to get copies of the
document in as many hands as possible, particularly in the nation's capital.
As for the next phase of this project, Father
Arroyo has already settled upon a theme - the common good.
William Bole is a fellow of the Woodstock
Theological Center at Georgetown University in Washington, and a journalist in
Massachusetts. (To order a copy of "The Ethics of Lobbying," call
202-687-3532 or send an email to woodstock@georgetown.edu.) |